Israel 2026 Elections AI Visibility Index
A simulation of how AI chatbots respond to different Israeli voter personas asking election-related questions.
The Elections AI Visibility Index (EAVI) is a simulation that analyzes how AI chatbots respond when different voter AI personas ask election-related questions. It shows which parties appear in AI-generated answers, and how those answers change by persona, gender, topic, and LLM. Results are based on a single simulation snapshot from the date shown below the table.
Learn more: FAQ | Methodology
Please note
This index is intended for research and analysis purposes only. It does not predict election results, does not represent the actual opinions of voters or the public, and should not be interpreted as political advice or a recommendation on who to vote for.
FAQ
Elections AI Visibility Index (EAVI) is designed to help understand AI visibility, answer framing, and the role generative AI may play in political discovery.
We created a set of Israeli AI voter personas based on different demographic, social, and psychological profiles.
Each persona asked election-related questions across key public issues, including governance, economy, security, social unity, education, and more.
Chatoptic then analyzed how different AI models responded, which parties or candidates appeared in the answers, and how visibility changed by persona, gender, model, category, and public issue.
The table above lets you explore the results and compare how AI systems frame political options when different voter personas ask for guidance.
Learn more about the methodology
Update Frequency
The index is updated periodically. Each new scan re-runs the persona-based prompts, so results can change as AI models update, sources change, or political events unfold.
Clicking on a party name opens its visibility trend over time by LLM. Each point on the timeline represents a new scan.
Please note: The EAVI results are based on a single simulation run completed on the date shown below the results table. They reflect the specific prompts, voter personas, persona attributes, and AI models tested in that run. Because AI answers can change, the results should be read as a snapshot, not as a long-term visibility trend.
Chatoptic is an AI visibility tool that helps brands, organizations, and public entities understand how they appear across leading LLMs like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Grok.
As more people use AI tools to search, compare, learn, and make decisions, it is no longer enough to know how you rank on Google. You also need to know how AI chatbots describe you, which sources they use, which competitors they mention, and which audiences are exposed to your brand in AI-generated answers.
Chatoptic helps teams track and improve their visibility, allowing analyze:
- Which prompts trigger your brand, organization, party, or competitors
- How different AI models describe you
- Which sources are used to support AI-generated answers
- How visibility changes across topics, languages, markets, and personas
- Where your competitors appear instead of you
- What actions can improve your AI visibility over time
Learn more about Chatoptic’s AI Visibility Tool or Schedule a demo.
No. This is not a poll and it does not measure voter intention. It does not show who people plan to vote for. It only shows how AI models respond to simulated voter questions.
No. The index does not predict election results. It analyzes AI visibility and answer framing, not actual voting behavior.
No. Chatoptic does not recommend, support, or oppose any political party or candidate. The purpose of this project is to study how AI systems present political options to different types of voters.
AI voter personas are simulated profiles that represent different types of Israeli voters. Each persona includes details such as age, gender, location, family status, occupation, social background, concerns, values, and tone of voice.
Because AI answers are shaped not only by the question itself, but also by the context around the person asking it.
A generic question like “Who should I vote for?” can produce a broad, cautious answer. But real voters do not ask questions in a vacuum. Their age, location, background, concerns, values, life situation, and wording can all influence how an AI model frames the answer.
That is why Chatoptic uses AI personas as a core part of the system. Each persona is designed to simulate a specific type of voter, so the prompt reflects a more realistic human context rather than a generic query.
This matters because LLMs are not deterministic.
Small changes can lead to different answers. By testing with structured personas, we can better understand how AI visibility changes across different voter types and get closer to the kind of answers real people might receive.
Yes. AI answers can change because of model updates, live web access, news events, available sources, and small changes in prompt wording.
As more people use AI chatbots to understand complex topics, including politics, AI answers may influence which parties, candidates, and ideas people notice. This makes AI visibility an important new layer in political discovery.
What does AI say when consumers ask about your brand?
Just like voters, your audience asks AI for product recommendations and different personas get different answers. Chatoptic helps you monitor, track and optimize your brand’s visibility and reputation across all major LLMs.